NYPD committed Crimes in my Case and how many other cases?

They love using Ron Kuby's letter to pretend I was not coerced and the NYPD did not commit a pile up of crimes.
The Detectives in my case Det Vergona and Det Andy Dwyer, their partners, and supervisors and facebook friends NYPD PO Eugene Schatz aka Gene Schatz and Det Tommy Moran were party to the fact Verogna was lying in his DD5s and was going to verbally violently threaten me over the phone because the cowardly criminal detectives and supervisors did not have it in them to commit the crimes they committed and face me but they did use Ron Kuby's letter to pretend they dd not commit crimes and Internal Affairs has protected them along w/ top brass all party to retaliation.

I had respected the NYPD until NYPD PO Gene Schatz and his facebook friends Detective Andrew Dwyer and Det John Vergona, with their partners, and supervisors DI Ed Winski, Lt Angelo Burgos and Sgt Chen did a bait and switch downgrading their crimes and Delita HOOKS crimes to no crimes. Google Dr Fagelman assault and see Delita HOOKS in action but she wasn't done breaking laws and the NYPD detectives and supervisors joined in and did Dr Andrew Fagelman quite a favor since he did not fire his violent, manipulative attack receptionist and when a private investigator asked Dr Fagelman did you talk to the NYPD he said "no comment" aka he would implicate himself in the crimes of arranging for Delita HOOKS to walk in and commit a crime filing a false cross complaint and Dr Fagelman was party to even more crimes the face Det John VERGONA was going to violently threaten me over the phone with false arrest on a Saturday 4pm only for the utmost retaliation and even fabrication of crimes which Eric Garner outlines in his own case 4 years ago....
These corrupt evil people would teach be about the real NYPD and how they break laws, do fixing and favors and all these years Internal Affairs protected these crimes along with Corp Counsel Zachary Carter lied in my case and his predecessor before him.

Thursday, November 28, 2013

Mayor Bloomberg Ray Kelly SAIC CityTime Crime Spy Bid Lost SAIC snags Oakland SAIC caught Lying

In their rush to build a controversial mass surveillance system, Oakland city officials appear to have allowed employees of the project's prime contractor to perjure themselves by claiming that the company was in compliance with the city's Nuclear Weapons Free Zone Ordinance. 

(In my opinion) No Gerard Denault working for SAIC in Oakland but thanks to Judge Daniels and Preet Bharara in my opinion like Cy Vance in the Haggerty trial -- top officials from SAIC and NYC Gov including Mike Bloomberg, Rose Gill Hearn and Mark Page, Joel Bondy an out and out crook, among many, had nothing to fear….   Fantastic SAIC busted yet again…..

Mayor Bloomberg Ray Kelly SAIC CityTime Crime Spy Bid Lost SAIC snags Oakland SAIC caught Lying

 No Denault working on Oakland's spy system but SAIC already caught lying yet again?  It is part of the greedy corrupt culture and mostly contractors get away with it with the gov officials aiding and abetting and why?

Remember Rudy's deputy mayors turned lobbyist for SAIC along with Liz Holtzman  (see YouTube w/her and Goldsmith think she was at the Crain's breakfast lobbying for SAIC?)

Well my guess is SAIC wanted to do the Surveillance for NYC NYPD's spy system called *Domain Awareness  but SAIC got busted finally for years of stealing but that is the norm these days and under Bloomberg it was open season for stealing aka over billing the tax payers and the 911 Tech even worse….    *is it about policing and shunting mega millions around as the police fix crime -- let's ask Adrian Schoolcraft, Michael Premo and me for our opinions. I gave the NYPD video of a crime and than I caught the NYPD and IAB fixing the fact I was assaulted and the NYPD coerced me to drop charges.  Why should tax payers pay for spying when the cops are fixing crime so what is the high priced spying really about and why did Judge Daniels and Preet Bharara work to keep Mike Bloomberg and top gov officials out of a trial that they should have been forced to come in and answer questions under oath because it seems the Mazer  Denault actions where par for the course and we can't even get a criminal trial on 911 Tech Corruption for some reason.

Now what a surprise SAIC caught lying in Oakland contract like what the MTA SAIC deal where SAIC mystically came in with the lowest bid but Greg Mocker of WPIX found out if SAIC went over budget the bills for SAIC would go to NYC Gov aka NYC tax payer --- sounds like a scam and acceptable from The White House to Albany and to City Hall and that is why there is NO CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION AND TRIAL IN TO 911 TECH CORRUPTION BIGGER THAN CITYTIME AND ALL UNDER MIKE BLOOMBERG, TEAM BLOOMBERG, CHRISTINE QUINN MOST OF CITY COUNCIL WHO LATE IN THE GAME CHANGED THEIR TUNE -- TOO LATE SINCE THEY ALLOWED 1 BILLION PLUS OVER RUN ON CITYTIME!!!!!!!

Am I the only one questioning if SAIC has broken their deferred prosecution agreement which was like admitting guilt and getting away with their corrupt behavior which started from the get go in my opinion before Denault was hired.  

Look in to SAIC FBI Triology
SAIC NSA Trailblazer
and so many other corrupt SAIC Deals but SAIC is bailed out oops oh given contracts by the Pentagon --- SAIC is like the USPS -- they should both be out of business but they aren't for some reason.


CityTime Crime SAIC Deferred Prosecution Agreement Violated? Newest Scandal SAIC Oakland Surveillence

Democracy NOW FYI my blog reported on the Deb does the White House before Juan's exclusive. 

My exclusives remain untouched on Denault suing SAIC winning they have to pay ALL his legal bills -- Denault didn't sign contracts according to annonymous source and guess which Deb did????

"In their rush to build a controversial mass surveillance system, Oakland city officials appear to have allowed employees of the project's prime contractor to perjure themselves by claiming that the company was in compliance with the city's Nuclear Weapons Free Zone Ordinance. The ordinance, enacted by Oakland voters and the city council in the late 1980s, prohibits the city from doing business with private contractors that have ties to nuclear weapons. Public records show that the contractor, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), had been involved heavily over the years in nuclear weapons-related work.
Internal city emails obtained by the Oakland Privacy Working Group, a coalition opposed to the surveillance center, show that SAIC officials were concerned about Oakland's nuclear-free-zone law early this year, and that they pressured the city to waive compliance with the ordinance before signing a final contract in March. City staffers, however, ruled out obtaining a waiver due to time constraints, and also because it would require approval by the full city council, making the contract subject to a public hearing. SAIC officials then signed a city document under penalty of perjury stating that the company was not involved in nuclear weapons-related work — when, in fact, it was.
Oakland officials do not appear to have specifically asked SAIC why it wanted the nuclear-free-zone waiver. Instead, staff in the city's contracts and compliance office, the office of information technology, the fire department, and lawyers from the city attorney's office allowed SAIC to sign Schedule P, Oakland's "Nuclear Free Disclosure Form.""


No comments:

Post a Comment