NYPD committed Crimes in my Case and how many other cases?

They love using Ron Kuby's letter to pretend I was not coerced and the NYPD did not commit a pile up of crimes.
The Detectives in my case Det Vergona and Det Andy Dwyer, their partners, and supervisors and facebook friends NYPD PO Eugene Schatz aka Gene Schatz and Det Tommy Moran were party to the fact Verogna was lying in his DD5s and was going to verbally violently threaten me over the phone because the cowardly criminal detectives and supervisors did not have it in them to commit the crimes they committed and face me but they did use Ron Kuby's letter to pretend they dd not commit crimes and Internal Affairs has protected them along w/ top brass all party to retaliation.

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

NYPD whistleblower Did not use N Word Even More Lies by Supervisor DI Steven Mauriello?

NYPD whistleblower Did not use N Word Even More Lies by Supervisor DI Steven Mauriello?

NYPD Deputy Inspector Steven Mauriello among five cops charged with tampering with crime reports - NY Daily News

Above and example of why I think the supervisor is a liar and a dirty cop and I've listened to some of the tape which proves my opinion that he fixes crime just like what was done to me

Thanks and gratitude for making a difference.  
ps http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dh9TedhfthE&sns=em please help this go viral so shame MD, my attacker, NYPD and IAB thank you. 

Whistleblower cop: supervisormade up racist quote for legal fight

By Rich Calder — Monday, April 14th, 2014 ‘The New York Post’



Insisting he’s no racist, whistleblower, copAdrian Schoolcraft is accusing a topNYPD supervisor of “maliciously” claiming he used the N-word to bolster a bitter legal fight.


Schoolcraft asked Manhattan federal Judge Robert Sweet last week to remove a controversial sentence from a March countersuit filed against him by Deputy Inspector Steven Mauriello. The sentence quotes Schoolcraft as saying that officers at the 81st Precinct in Brooklyn, which Mauriello previously commanded, “just worked together, so we wouldn’t have to work with any n—–s.”


In an April 7 legal filing, Schoolcraft’s lawyer, Nathaniel Smith, claimed that the racist comments in the countersuit were “maliciously inserted without any legitimate purpose.”


Mauriello’s lawyer, Walter Kretz, said Sunday that Schoolcraft was “not misquoted and there is nothing alleged maliciously.” He claimed a recording proves Schoolcraft used the slur.


In his $2 million counterclaim, Mauriello alleges Schoolcraft drummed up bogus complaints about wrongdoing at the 81st because he wanted to punish his ex-commander. He filed the countersuit in response to a $50 million lawsuitSchoolcraft filed claiming he was forced to spend time in a mental ward after saying cops at the 81st fudged crime stats.

No comments:

Post a Comment