NYPD committed Crimes in my Case and how many other cases?
http://nypdnewcommission.blogspot.com/2017/04/ray-kelly-charles-campisi-bratton.html They love using Ron Kuby's letter to pretend I was not coerced and the NYPD did not commit a pile up of crimes.
The Detectives in my case Det Vergona and Det Andy Dwyer, their partners, and supervisors and facebook friends NYPD PO Eugene Schatz aka Gene Schatz and Det Tommy Moran were party to the fact Verogna was lying in his DD5s and was going to verbally violently threaten me over the phone because the cowardly criminal detectives and supervisors did not have it in them to commit the crimes they committed and face me but they did use Ron Kuby's letter to pretend they dd not commit crimes and Internal Affairs has protected them along w/ top brass all party to retaliation.
I had respected the NYPD until NYPD PO Gene Schatz and his facebook friends Detective Andrew Dwyer and Det John Vergona, with their partners, and supervisors DI Ed Winski, Lt Angelo Burgos and Sgt Chen did a bait and switch downgrading their crimes and Delita HOOKS crimes to no crimes. Google Dr Fagelman assault and see Delita HOOKS in action but she wasn't done breaking laws and the NYPD detectives and supervisors joined in and did Dr Andrew Fagelman quite a favor since he did not fire his violent, manipulative attack receptionist and when a private investigator asked Dr Fagelman did you talk to the NYPD he said "no comment" aka he would implicate himself in the crimes of arranging for Delita HOOKS to walk in and commit a crime filing a false cross complaint and Dr Fagelman was party to even more crimes the face Det John VERGONA was going to violently threaten me over the phone with false arrest on a Saturday 4pm only for the utmost retaliation and even fabrication of crimes which Eric Garner outlines in his own case 4 years ago....
These corrupt evil people would teach be about the real NYPD and how they break laws, do fixing and favors and all these years Internal Affairs protected these crimes along with Corp Counsel Zachary Carter lied in my case and his predecessor before him.
Friday, April 22, 2016
Bill Bratton Note to #NYPD Sgt took scandal scarred Lt Exam
To the Sergeants who took the 2015 Examination for Lieutenant, Exam # 5535:
As you know, a lawsuit has been filed by a small number of sergeants who took the exam, requesting that it be invalidated and that no promotions be made from the list. The City Law Department is defending the case. Yesterday it informed the plaintiffs that it is the New York City Police Department’s intention to begin making promotions from the eligible list. The NYPD and the City will now wait to hear whether the court will allow or prohibit this.
With regard to the test, the Department of Citywide Administrative Services (DCAS) has certified the list of eligible promotes. Because it was certified, that decision cannot be revisited, and the list will not be revised. I know this is unwelcome news for those sergeants whose scores were in the high 60s.
Questions have been raised about this exam. The Department has begun to investigate those questions over which it has jurisdiction. Other questions must be left to other controlling agencies, such as DCAS and the Department of Investigation (DOI).
The NYPD’s investigation is centered on officers’ requests to take the exam on makeup dates, and the validity of those requests. We have already discovered inconsistencies in several requests. The individuals who made those invalid requests will not be promoted.
The following is the Department’s intended course of action relative to Exam 5535:
1) The NYPD will proceed with promotions from the active list for Exam 5535, unless prohibited by the court.
2) The NYPD reminds sergeants promoted from the list that their rank of Lieutenant is probationary for one year after promotion.
3) The NYPD will continue to investigate the nature of excusal requests associated with Exam 5535.
4) The NYPD will work with DCAS to end Saturdayexaminations, thus removing the need for most excusals.
5) The NYPD will cooperate with DCAS and DOI in any investigations they conduct.
I am sending this in order to ensure that the information you receive about the exam is accurate and timely, and not shared piecemeal through the media or third parties. As frontline supervisors and indispensable members of the Department’s operations, you deserve no less, and I will continue to keep you apprised of new developments if they occur.
William J. Bratton